In an effort to attract customers, companies like Amazon and Zoom have been highlighting their corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts through detailed reports.
These reports allow businesses to showcase their initiatives benefiting employees, customers, communities, and the environment—highlighting objectives beyond profit generation. Research indicates that CSR disclosures are linked to increased sales.
As a marketing professor, this connection led to an intriguing inquiry: Are the extra sales generated by CSR disclosures attracting new clients, or are they merely enhancing purchases from the current customer base?
In a recent investigation involving the examination of numerous Chinese companies, a collaborator and I aimed to address this inquiry. Our results indicated that CSR disclosures lessen a company’s dependence on its current clientele by 2.1%.
This outcome is encouraging for companies—it shows that the extra sales are being fueled by new clients who are favorably impacted by the firm’s CSR initiatives.
Nonetheless, the outcomes additionally highlighted difficulties.
In order to boost sales, businesses frequently find it necessary to broaden their supply acquisition. This leads to the following inquiry: Do CSR disclosures aid companies in gaining new suppliers?
To our surprise, we discovered the contrary. Businesses releasing CSR reports seemed to discourage potential suppliers. This may stem from the fact that suppliers frequently bear extra expenses when a business focuses on social responsibility.
Relying heavily on suppliers can become costly for businesses. When suppliers recognize that a company depends on them, they are more likely to demand cash payments instead of extending credit. This reduction in credit availability can strain a company’s cash flow, leaving fewer resources for investment.
Thus, while CSR disclosures can attract customers, they may alienate suppliers—posing a potential downside.
While previous research has established that CSR disclosures can boost sales, it has been unclear whether these sales are sourced from new or existing customers. Our study provides clarity that can guide business decision-making.
This insight is also relevant to policymakers, regulators, and advocates for corporate responsibility, who are debating whether CSR reporting should become mandatory.
While the U.S. does not require companies to issue CSR reports, other nations, such as China, do. Since 2009, all public companies in China have been mandated to submit annual CSR reports—a requirement that provided the foundation for our study.
Interestingly, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has thought about the possibility of mandating CSR disclosure. Until such regulations are established, numerous American firms will probably keep issuing these reports on their own initiative.
Considering these advancements, the demand for empirical data regarding the advantages and expenses of CSR reporting is more crucial than ever.
Future Directions
Growing concerns about extreme weather events and their associated human impacts have piqued my interest in environmental responsibility. I am currently working on two research projects in this area.
First, I am analyzing companies’ public disclosures to assess their environmental risks and the measures they’ve taken to mitigate them. Second, I am investigating how CEO incentives influence corporate environmental disclosures, actions, and spending—or the lack thereof.
